Flat map – fibre dimension

By dunghoangnguyen

Flat map has a nice property : the fibre dimension is very well behaved. Assume we have a flat map f : X \to Y . If we take a point x on X, y its image, then the dimension of the fibre over y ( going through x ) is exactly as we expect : the difference between the local dimension at x and that at y :
\dim _xX_y = \dim_xX - \dim_yY

Idea of proof :

-The proof use a lot of steps involving simplifying the situation. First we can base change to make y a closed point, Y is a local affine scheme ( Spectrum of a local ring ) , by base change to O_{y,Y}. This is in effect focus all attention to the local property at y . Note that the local information at x is preserved because we infact take the direct limit of the inverse of a local basis at y , which must as not refined as a local basis at x. This can be check using using affine open sets at x and y .

- Next we can, by base change ( cut out the sheaf of nilradical), get rid of all the nilpotents in Y, make it into a reduced scheme.

. This does not change dimensions at all. Now we can proceed by induction : we can choose an element t in O_{y,Y} that is not a zero divisor. Then the subscheme defined by t is one dimension less. The pull back of the subscheme ( corresponds to the base change by the map that injects the subscheme into Y ) is defined on X by the inverse image ideal of (t), which is non-zero-divisor at x by flatness, hence define a subschem passing through x which is 1 dimension less, and this agrees with the hypothesis.

Since we need the dimension to decrease by exactly one after being cut out by a non zero divisor, we need the schemes to be of finite type over an a.c. field k.

The above result is a local property. If we need to make claims about the relative dimension between the components of X with their images are all the same, we need to make an assumption that all the fibres have the same dimensions. The two things are infact equivalent.

Leave a Reply